Home/Supreme Court/Wheat v. Washington

Wheat v. Washington

392 U.S. 652, 88 S. Ct. 2302, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1357, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1162
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 17, 1968
Docket1301 M
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 392 U.S. 652 (Wheat v. Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wheat v. Washington, 392 U.S. 652, 88 S. Ct. 2302, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1357, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1162 (1968).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments of the Supreme Court of Washington are vacated and the cases remanded to that court for reconsideration in the light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, and Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U. S. 510.

Mr. Justice Black dissents. Mr. Justice Harlan dissents for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice Black’s dissenting opinion in Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U. S. 510, 532, and Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138. Mr. Justice White dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinions in Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U. S. 510, 540, and Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Personal Restraint Petition Of Arthur Nathaniel Aiken
Court of Appeals of Washington, 2020
State of Washington v. Cory Edward Mesecher
Court of Appeals of Washington, 2015
State of Washington v. Jose Garcia Morales
Court of Appeals of Washington, 2014
State Of Washington, V Desmond R. Johnson And Kevin Franklin
Court of Appeals of Washington, 2013
Martini Ex Rel. Dussault v. State
89 P.3d 250 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2004)
Martini v. State
121 Wash. App. 150 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2004)
Arthur Nathaniel Aiken v. James Spalding, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary, and Slade Gorton, Attorney General, State of Washington
841 F.2d 881 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
Spalding Et Al. v. Aiken
460 U.S. 1093 (Supreme Court, 1983)
State v. McDonald
571 P.2d 930 (Washington Supreme Court, 1977)
State v. Fullen
499 P.2d 893 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1972)
United States ex rel. Ordog v. Yeager
299 F. Supp. 321 (D. New Jersey, 1969)
Williams v. State
228 So. 2d 377 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)
State v. Aiken
452 P.2d 232 (Washington Supreme Court, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
392 U.S. 652, 88 S. Ct. 2302, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1357, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wheat-v-washington-scotus-1968.