Whaley v. Broadwater

2 S.E. 749, 78 Ga. 336
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 26, 1887
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 S.E. 749 (Whaley v. Broadwater) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whaley v. Broadwater, 2 S.E. 749, 78 Ga. 336 (Ga. 1887).

Opinion

Hall, Justice.

1. This was a suit on an account for services rendered by plaintiff to defendant in attending to and running his saw-mill, to which the general issue and set-off were pleaded. The jury found against both pleas, and returned a verdict for the full amount of the account sued on, but found no interest. The plaintiff admitted his indebtedness to the defendant in the sum of $85.70. A motion for a new trial was made, and the court granted it unless the latter amount was written off, which was immediately done, and that being the case, the new trial was refused. The evidence on the material points in dispute being conflicting, and there being enough to sustain the verdict, except as to the sum written off, there was- no error in thus disposing of the motion.

2. Inasmuch as the jury gave the plaintiff no interest on his claim, we think that the defendant was entitled to none on the amount ordered to be written from the verdict, and that the complaint made for refusing to allow it on this sum is not well founded.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lee v. Bagwell
82 S.E. 49 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Perkerson
38 S.E. 365 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 S.E. 749, 78 Ga. 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whaley-v-broadwater-ga-1887.