Weylin Alford v. State

Opinion

.,\nn\lfo VO b&M #• tj^lE Cout2.T or uljmikuvv

ftppeilee

<^z—H-

ux&V ^ESoltow __

-TL »©

to *!•

... / vjv \\ y I (M-2__L

&l\]fl£^^ J^i^W^4K10«^W

v*fc^E$jb^^

^)____i\Bj^El^

^\&_^

to

*'' _iil__k_^ EEte,fed i_tine Sfrtes facufjVl __ WfeaihWW^ J^___ So)^

^Wid__m^ 1 ^ fe&DuS- ;e_}_^_±>_ \gM ^oidt&tl^vi 2^aV\o ^b^frfts________.Could __t___4_____fiffAL

fte^Ctg»r. App.1^^)jKflcWU•\T>S.iO^diA--V vr-vs (^mM&& fags.i^m^Ma__k_&__ Mli$___ir^^ UJCUCl 3_H!___Vfe(±^

1$ \fe _____ _\g_ |SB_Mg_ _i_ S_l^__(____£K_\SuOPJ-Vie fiafr _S&^ jte___%) mV^iCi^r

^ Ssft %_saM\bK) as$axyifeV4\foaA £_^_M M*fa dra-ico uMdudA^_i~ o

$&s_^_^tAA feyaVi jv»£ ijSSism h^MmkM^^ ______j_fe^^ Qe£R___) CcMO^_ 4 taxfltojs UH£ ioeH Lat)__J j&g£ i_M u> sWak M_iLk ted^kxklfcki bfMSdP&_ig/r3glffeg teifg^ ETdifoA^u J/w _____j^E_^y kjyd^-fedfet qpe; ity Ck\MM& _j_y____j ^_____^___Mj_yedi^_fc p^^to^pfOSE^j/^^yjipc fttj Ji&ib _Q____mA MDAufK c^^_to______tpeEs4il

_J__UlkJa,^^

_i_S>£__!_^^ r=^pt^>qvini__iJL_ivo vuiwgJi tnciv-ui^;ic^j^j>i>^x;^ijiitt:„ ___ 0 \i _ 0 It. _oi \ P n In

to_t____j_u__aij^^ gfajjA?^ ^Coodusks^lML^fl^t^te ^CCfeTJM"^dh>ld wfeAI(M/

^»*r -HE /__ _%TJd^E^o^tMLQ!ldefta£it' _____l£&4itte_ Ht. -to: WWihLaaJJMajyUSfaosfitutfos) __g_6m)____bMft6j) s__ \J3 S&lMlflBiPkp-i^^ s mAtkt .. ____„____^„.M_._ _-.__.__^_^^__._Ik^^:Js^

ftSlJ_J___tel£Q^ &

A#^^p-ixgss ^^\^^^JM^i\L^^^_ —- __._: ,__,

h& jjjM frafer hwe oft opwfa.' u__taiM_^ u.eMifciQ^a

^__g|l_____l___3__fl_^_j_^__|__^p_»_^fc_______ *&\U\mRatalIfeMak^^ll .^gWlaite. paifypfyagfciJ Mfe&_ . tjbfwa_ttue ftud Cceted-, eKE_±^._iJfek^__C -^fc&e^ J____V§t___E^ ye^iaj^^ _ 61&1&I ^ftfm&kt- o

oTPiceI ~ ? *_uWTte_ ~":r~3)- _^HuT_; RECEIVED FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS SEP 1 4 2015 MAIL RECEIVED CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CLERK