Weylin Alford v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 20, 2015·No. 01-14-00822-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Weylin Alford v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-14-00822-CR

Trial court case number: 1404673

Trial court: 177th District Court of Harris County, Texas

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief concluding that the above- referenced appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967). On March 3, 2015, we granted appellant’s pro se motion requesting access to a copy of the appellate record for use in preparing a response to appointed counsel’s brief and extended the time within which to file a response to counsel’s Anders brief to April 2, 2015. The trial court clerk has notified the Clerk of this Court that the appellate record has been sent to appellant and he has received the record. Appellant has filed a motion for “extension of time/default,” requesting the Court to enter a judgment granting his motion for extension of time/default. We construe appellant’s motion as a request for an extension of time within which to file a response to counsel’s Anders brief and grant the requested extension. Appellant’s response to his appointed counsel’s brief shall be filed within 30 days of the date of this order. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 16, 2015

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weylin Alford v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Weylin Alford v. State (Weylin Alford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)