Wetutzke v. Wetutzke

148 N.W. 1088, 158 Wis. 305, 1914 Wisc. LEXIS 299
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 6, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 148 N.W. 1088 (Wetutzke v. Wetutzke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wetutzke v. Wetutzke, 148 N.W. 1088, 158 Wis. 305, 1914 Wisc. LEXIS 299 (Wis. 1914).

Opinions

WiNsnow, O. J.

It is held in this case:

1. The original transaction between Franz and his parents, by which Franz agreed to pay certain sums to Walentine -and Gertrude respectively in consideration of the conveyance of the farm, and executed a mortgage to secure such payments, established the relation of debtor and creditor between Franz and each of the beneficiaries, which relation could not be changed merely by agreement of the parents and Franz without the consent of the beneficiaries. Tweeddale v. Tweeddale, 116 Wis. 517, 93 N. W. 440.

2. Under the facts found by the court the plaintiff Walen-tine was plainly estopped from asserting any claim under the agreement or mortgage.

3. Not only is Walentine estopped, but he is barred by the twenty-year statute of limitations. Sub. 2, sec. 4220, Stats.

4. Gertrude, not being estopped or barred by the statute’ of limitations, is entitled to foreclose the mortgage for the-amount due her under the agreement, with interest.

By the Gourt. — That portion of the judgment dismissing the complaint, with costs, as to the plaintiff Walentine is affirmed with costs, and the remainder of the judgment is-[309]*309reversed, witb costs, and tbe action remanded to tbe circuit court witb directions to enter judgment of foreclosure in favor of tbe plaintiff Gertrude, as indicated in tbe opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kroening v. Kroening
269 N.W. 536 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1936)
Lutz v. Dunn
207 N.W. 713 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1926)
Sedgwick v. Blanchard
160 N.W. 267 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1916)
Concrete Steel Co. v. Illinois Surety Co.
157 N.W. 543 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1916)
Gimbel Bros. v. McConnell
150 N.W. 495 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 N.W. 1088, 158 Wis. 305, 1914 Wisc. LEXIS 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wetutzke-v-wetutzke-wis-1914.