Wetmore v. Conger & Phelps Lumber Co.
155 N.Y.S. 1148
Opinion
No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Held: (1) That the evidence sustains the verdict. (2) That the evidence of the usual rate of commission was competent. See Barney v. Fuller, 133 N. Y. 605, 30 N. E. 1007; Rubino v. Scott, 118 N. Y. 662, 22 N. E. 1103; Flagg v. Reilly, 23 App. Div. 57, 48 N. Y. Supp. 544.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wetmore v. Conger & Phelps Lumber Co., 155 N.Y.S. 1148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).
155 N.Y.S. 1148 (Wetmore v. Conger & Phelps Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barney v. . Fuller
30 N.E. 1007 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)
Rubino v. . Scott
23 N.E. 1103 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)
Flagg v. Reilly
23 A.D. 57 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Barney v. Fuller
133 N.Y. 605 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)