Wetmore v. Conger & Phelps Lumber Co.

171 A.D. 890

This text of 171 A.D. 890 (Wetmore v. Conger & Phelps Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wetmore v. Conger & Phelps Lumber Co., 171 A.D. 890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Held: 1.

That the evidence sustains the verdict. 2. That the evidence of the usual rate of commission was competent. (See Barney v. Fuller, 133 N. Y. 605; Rubino v. Scott, 118 id. 662; Flagg v. Reilly, 23 App. Div. 57.) All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Flagg v. Reilly
23 A.D. 57 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Barney v. Fuller
133 N.Y. 605 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 A.D. 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wetmore-v-conger-phelps-lumber-co-nyappdiv-1915.