Westgate Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Westgate Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.

26 N.E.3d 820, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1483

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 5, 2015

Docket2015-0114

StatusPublished

This text of 26 N.E.3d 820 (Westgate Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Westgate Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 26 N.E.3d 820, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1483 (Ohio 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. Nos. 101073 and 101136, 2014-Ohio-5429. Upon consideration of the motions for admission pro hac vice of Robert Foote, John A. Corr, Stephen A. Corr, James A. Pikl, Jonathan D. Hacker, and Rakesh Kilaru, it is ordered by the court that the motions are granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file notices of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. Nos. 101073 and 101136, 2014-Ohio-5429. Upon consideration of the motions for admission pro hac vice of Robert Foote, John A. Corr, Stephen A. Corr, James A. Pikl, Jonathan D. Hacker, and Rakesh Kilaru, it is ordered by the court that the motions are granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file notices of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 N.E.3d 820, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westgate-ford-truck-sales-inc-v-ford-motor-co-ohio-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack