Westfeldt Bros. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Westfeldt Bros. v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 842

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMay 29, 1958

DocketReap. Dec. 9161; Entry No. 6138

StatusPublished

This text of 40 Cust. Ct. 842 (Westfeldt Bros. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Westfeldt Bros. v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 842 (cusc 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Oliveb, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain felt base floor covering in rolls that was exported from Holland and entered at the port of New Orleans.

Stipulated facts, upon which the case has been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of this felt base floor covering is foreign value, as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and that such statutory value for the merchandise is 0.9184 Dutch florin per square yard, less 1 per centum packed, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oliveb, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain felt base floor covering in rolls that was exported from Holland and entered at the port of New Orleans.

Stipulated facts, upon which the case has been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of this felt base floor covering is foreign value, as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and that such statutory value for the merchandise is 0.9184 Dutch florin per square yard, less 1 per centum packed, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 Cust. Ct. 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westfeldt-bros-v-united-states-cusc-1958.