Westfall v. Rust International
This text of 815 P.2d 1272 (Westfall v. Rust International) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the matter of the Compensation of Randy R. WESTFALL, Claimant.
Randy R. Westfall, Petitioner On Review,
v.
RUST INTERNATIONAL and Underwriters Adjusting Company, Respondents On Review.
Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.
David C. Force of Vick & Gutzler, Salem, filed the petition, for petitioner on review.
Bradley R. Scheminske of Scheminske & Lyons, Portland, filed the response, for respondents on review.
David Gernant, Portland, filed a brief for amicus curiae Or. Trial Lawyers Ass'n.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, 107 Or. App. 395, 812 P.2d 31, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of this court's opinion in Mattiza v. Foster, 311 Or. 1, 803 P.2d 723 (1990).
NOTES
[*] Appeal from the Court of Appeals' Order Awarding Attorney Fee dated January 30, 1991.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
815 P.2d 1272, 312 Or. 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westfall-v-rust-international-or-1991.