Western Maryland Railway Co. v. United States

Court of Claims

Western Maryland Railway Co. v. United States

122 Ct. Cl. 420, 1952 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 109

DecidedMay 6, 1952

DocketNos. 49029 and 49798; Nos. 49207, 49349, 49951, and 50368; Nos. 49170, 49558, and 49952; Nos. 50184 and 50238; No. 50236; No. 50239; No. 50226

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 122 Ct. Cl. 420 (Western Maryland Railway Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Western Maryland Railway Co. v. United States, 122 Ct. Cl. 420, 1952 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 109 (cc 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The pleadings and the issue presented in, these cases are the same as in the case of Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. United States, 121 C. Cls. 467. For the reasons therein set forth, plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment, to the extent that they ask for an adjudication that the jeeps involved in these actions should ■be classified and rated as passenger motor vehicles, are .granted.

Entry of judgment is suspended pending the filing of a report by the General Accounting Office and the disposition of the issues relating to the proper amount to be paid to the plaintiffs for the transportation services herein involved.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The pleadings and the issue presented in, these cases are the same as in the case of Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. United States, 121 C. Cls. 467. For the reasons therein set forth, plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment, to the extent that they ask for an adjudication that the jeeps involved in these actions should ■be classified and rated as passenger motor vehicles, are .granted.

Entry of judgment is suspended pending the filing of a report by the General Accounting Office and the disposition of the issues relating to the proper amount to be paid to the plaintiffs for the transportation services herein involved.

It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 Ct. Cl. 420, 1952 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/western-maryland-railway-co-v-united-states-cc-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack