Western Land & Reclamation Co. v. Reclamation Board

283 U.S. 798, 51 S. Ct. 490
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 27, 1931·No. No. 290·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Guaranty Trust Co. v. New York & Queens County Ry. Co., 282 U. S. 803; Ennis Water Works v. City of Ennis, 233 U. S. 652, 658; Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Western Land & Reclamation Co. v. Reclamation Board, 283 U.S. 798, 51 S. Ct. 490 (1931).

283 U.S. 798 (Western Land & Reclamation Co. v. Reclamation Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wabash Railroad v. Flannigan
192 U.S. 29 (Supreme Court, 1904)
Ennis Water Works v. City of Ennis
233 U.S. 652 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Erie Railroad v. Solomon
237 U.S. 427 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Sugarman v. United States
249 U.S. 182 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Zucht v. King
260 U.S. 174 (Supreme Court, 1922)
Roe v. Kansas Ex Rel. Smith
278 U.S. 191 (Supreme Court, 1929)