Guaranty Trust Co. v. New York & Queens County Ry. Co.
282 U.S. 803
Opinion
The appeal hérein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Guaranty Trust Co. v. New York & Queens County Ry. Co., 282 U.S. 803 (1930).
282 U.S. 803 (Guaranty Trust Co. v. New York & Queens County Ry. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Streit v. Lujan
285 U.S. 527 (Supreme Court, 1932)
Western Land & Reclamation Co. v. Reclamation Board
283 U.S. 798 (Supreme Court, 1931)