Western Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
174 Cal. 315
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Western Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission. Read the opinion of the Court — 176 Cal. 776 →
Opinion
The hearsay testimony complained of relative to the statements of the deceased employee relating directly to his injury was competent under the provisions of section 77a of the Workmen’s Compensation, Insurance and Safety Act, as amended in 1915, [Stats. 1915, p. 1102].
We are satisfied that such provisions cannot he held invalid as opposed to any provision of our constitution.
The application for a writ of review is denied.
Rehearing denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Western Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission, 174 Cal. 315 (Cal. 1917).
174 Cal. 315 (Western Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.