Western Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Western Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

174 Cal. 315

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 29, 1917

DocketL. A. No. 5098

StatusPublished

This text of 174 Cal. 315 (Western Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Western Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission, 174 Cal. 315 (Cal. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

The hearsay testimony complained of relative to the statements of the deceased employee relating directly to his injury was competent under the provisions of section 77a of the Workmen’s Compensation, Insurance and Safety Act, as amended in 1915, [Stats. 1915, p. 1102].

We are satisfied that such provisions cannot he held invalid as opposed to any provision of our constitution.

The application for a writ of review is denied.

Rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

The hearsay testimony complained of relative to the statements of the deceased employee relating directly to his injury was competent under the provisions of section 77a of the Workmen’s Compensation, Insurance and Safety Act, as amended in 1915, [Stats. 1915, p. 1102].

We are satisfied that such provisions cannot he held invalid as opposed to any provision of our constitution.

The application for a writ of review is denied.

Rehearing denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 Cal. 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/western-indemnity-co-v-industrial-accident-commission-cal-1917.