WESTERN HOST ATLANTA, INC. v. Bass

358 S.E.2d 312, 183 Ga. App. 160, 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 1903
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 1, 1987
Docket74370
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 358 S.E.2d 312 (WESTERN HOST ATLANTA, INC. v. Bass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
WESTERN HOST ATLANTA, INC. v. Bass, 358 S.E.2d 312, 183 Ga. App. 160, 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 1903 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff, an entertainer, brought suit against defendant seeking damages stemming from the alleged breach of two performance contracts. The case was tried by the trial court sitting without a jury. Upon the close of the evidence the trial court entered judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant in the amount of $8,000. This sum was $3,550 less than the maximum amount of damages which plaintiff incurred.

Defendant appeals and in its sole enumeration of error contends the trial court erred by failing to hold that plaintiff did not mitigate her damages. Held:

1. The burden was upon defendant to prove that plaintiff could have lessened her damages. Mimms v. J. L. Betts Co., 9 Ga. App. 718, 720 (2) (72 SE 271). Thus, it was incumbent upon defendant to prove that plaintiff did not mitigate her damages “as far as is practicable by the use of ordinary care and diligence.” OCGA § 13-6-5. This defendant failed to do.

Although evidence was presented that defendant offered to reinstate the contracts if plaintiff was willing to perform during a two-week trial period, defendant failed to show whether plaintiff was in a position to work the two-week period into her schedule. It cannot be said, therefore, that the evidence demanded a finding that plaintiff could have mitigated her damages by the exercise of ordinary care and diligence. OCGA § 13-6-5.

2. Plaintiff’s request for imposition of damages for a frivolous appeal is denied. Although defendant’s enumeration of error is not meritorious, it is not so specious as to warrant the conclusion that the appeal was taken for the purpose of delay only. Ranger Constr. Co. v. Robertshaw Controls Co., 166 Ga. App. 679, 683 (5) (305 SE2d 361).

Judgment affirmed.

Sognier and Beasley, JJ., concur. *161 Calvin A. Leipold, Jr., for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cincinnati Insurance v. MacLeod
577 S.E.2d 799 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2003)
McLane v. Atlanta Market Center Management Co.
486 S.E.2d 30 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Victory Sign Industries, Ltd. v. Potter
430 S.E.2d 882 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)
Lamb v. Decatur Federal Savings & Loan Association
411 S.E.2d 527 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
358 S.E.2d 312, 183 Ga. App. 160, 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 1903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/western-host-atlanta-inc-v-bass-gactapp-1987.