Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Smith

94 S.E. 835, 21 Ga. App. 538, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 395

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 21, 1918

Docket8631

StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.E. 835 (Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Smith, 94 S.E. 835, 21 Ga. App. 538, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 395 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

Upon the first trial of this ease, a writ of error was taken to the Supreme Court; See Western & Atlantic B. Co. v. Smith, 145 Ga. 276 (88 S. E. 983). That decision is the law of this ease upon every question then decided, and the present writ of error presents no substantial new question for decision. The evidence amply supports the [539]*539verdict, and tlie trial judge did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Decided January 21, 1918.

Action for damages; from Whitfield superior court — Judge Fite. November 26, 1916.

Tye, Peeples & Tye, Maddox, McCamy & Shumate, for plaintiff in error. Lipscomb & Willingham, Nathan Harris, Geo.rge G. Glenn, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

1Wade, G. J.,'and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI