Westchester Fire Insurance v. Continental Insurance
This text of 319 A.2d 732 (Westchester Fire Insurance v. Continental Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. Westchester Fire Insurance Co., Richard B. Holcombe, Alice Holcombe and Wilbur S. Holcombe v. The Continental Insurance Companies New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Co., Motor Club Fire & Casualty Co., Jackie W. Eisner, etc., and Elmer Richard Potent, Guardian Ad Litem for Richard M. Potent, an infant, Elmer Richard Potent and Charlotte Potent, individually, vs. Jackie W. Eisner, Haltie Eisner, Elmer Eisner, Sr., and Richard B. Holcombe, Sr., etc, 126 N. J. Super.
For reversal — Hone.
For affirmance — Justices Jacobs, Hall, Mountain, Sullivan and Pashman — 5.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
319 A.2d 732, 65 N.J. 152, 1974 N.J. LEXIS 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westchester-fire-insurance-v-continental-insurance-nj-1974.