West Virginia CWP Fund v. Matlick

568 F. App'x 231
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 25, 2014·No. No. 13-1922·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

West Virginia CWP Fund seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) award of black lung benefits to Carl E. Matlick, pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2012). Our review of the record discloses that the ALJ’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. See Island Creek Coal Co. v. Compton, 211 F.3d 203, 207-08 (4th Cir.2000) (providing standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

West Virginia CWP Fund v. Matlick, 568 F. App'x 231 (4th Cir. 2014).

568 F. App'x 231 (West Virginia CWP Fund v. Matlick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related