West Virginia CWP Fund v. Matlick
This text of 568 F. App'x 231 (West Virginia CWP Fund v. Matlick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
West Virginia CWP Fund seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) award of black lung benefits to Carl E. Matlick, pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2012). Our review of the record discloses that the ALJ’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. See Island Creek Coal Co. v. Compton, 211 F.3d 203, 207-08 (4th Cir.2000) (providing standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
568 F. App'x 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-virginia-cwp-fund-v-matlick-ca4-2014.