West v. Collins

863 F.2d 50, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 15654, 1988 WL 124368
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedNovember 22, 1988
Docket88-5938
StatusUnpublished

This text of 863 F.2d 50 (West v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
West v. Collins, 863 F.2d 50, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 15654, 1988 WL 124368 (6th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

863 F.2d 50

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
David M. WEST, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Martha Layne COLLINS, Governor; Steve Beshear, Lt.
Governor; Drexel Davis, Secretary; David Armstrong,
Attorney General; Charles Morehead, Warren County Court
Clerk; the State Democratic Committee, Frankfort, Kentucky;
John Deeb, Chairman, Warren County; Yvonne Guy, Warren
County Court Deputy Clerk; Edward Coleman, State Chairman;
Billy Ray Smith, State Representative; Jody Richards, State
Representative; Frank Miller, State Senator; Donald
Blandford, Speaker of the House; Joe Prather, President
Pro-Tem of State Senate, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-5938.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 22, 1988.

Before DAVID A. NELSON and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and RICHARD A. ENSLEN, District Judge.*

ORDER

This matter is before the court upon consideration of the appellant's response to this court's September 19, 1988 order directing him to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed of lack of jurisdiction.

A review of the record indicates that appellant seeks to appeal a judgment entered by the district court on June 14, 1988. Pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 4(a), a notice of appeal was required to have been filed within 30 days, i.e., July 14, 1988. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on August 19, 1988, 36 days late. Appellant states in his response that he suffers from stress related exhaustion and a communicable rash-like disease which prohibits him from timely filing a notice of appeal.

This court lacks jurisdiction in this appeal. The failure of an appellant to timely file a notice of appeal deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction. Compliance with Fed.R.App.P. 4(a) is a mandatory and jurisdictional prerequisite which this court can neither waive nor extend. McMillan v. Barksdale, 823 F.2d 981, 982 (6th Cir.1987); Myers v. Ace Hardware, Inc., 777 F.2d 1099, 1102 (6th Cir.1985); Denley v. Shearson/American Express, Inc., 733 F.2d 39, 41 (6th Cir.1984) (per curiam); Peake v. First Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 717 F.2d 1016, 1018 (6th Cir.1983). Fed.R.App.P. 26(b) specifically provides that this court cannot enlarge the time for filing a notice of appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

*

The Honorable Richard A. Enslen, U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
863 F.2d 50, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 15654, 1988 WL 124368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-collins-ca6-1988.