West v. Carolina Housing & Mortgage Corp.

89 S.E.2d 188, 211 Ga. 789, 1955 Ga. LEXIS 463
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 12, 1955
Docket19010
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 89 S.E.2d 188 (West v. Carolina Housing & Mortgage Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
West v. Carolina Housing & Mortgage Corp., 89 S.E.2d 188, 211 Ga. 789, 1955 Ga. LEXIS 463 (Ga. 1955).

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

1. “One having the capacity and opportunity to read a written contract, and who signs it, not under any emergency, and whose signature is not obtained by any trick or artifice of the other party, can not afterwards set up fraud in the procurement of his signature to the instrument.” Truitt-Silvey Hat Co. v. Callaway & Truitt, 130 Ga. 637 (61 S. E. 481); Lewis v. Foy, 189 Ga. 596 (6 S. E. 2d 788).

2. The petitioners’ allegations, as finally amended, being that they were ignorant colored people, practically illiterate, and totally incapable of reading and understanding the nature of the papers presented to them for their signature; that it was late at night, and there was no one to turn to for advice and guidance at that time; and that they were, therefore, required to rely upon the representations of the agents of one of the defendants, which were false, are totally insufficient to relieve them of due diligence or to show any emergency making it necessary for them to sign without delay; and there being no fiduciary relationship between the parties, the petition fails to allege a cause of action, and the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer and in dismissing the petition.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carr v. Jacuzzi Bros., Inc.
210 S.E.2d 16 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Beckwith v. Peterson
181 S.E.2d 51 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. Meeks
174 S.E.2d 585 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Perry
174 S.E.2d 570 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Cole v. Cates
149 S.E.2d 165 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Williams v. RENTZ BANKING COMPANY
145 S.E.2d 256 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
Pirkle v. Gurr
128 S.E.2d 490 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1962)
Dodson v. Culp
122 S.E.2d 109 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1961)
Martin v. Alford
102 S.E.2d 598 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)
Adams v. Perry
99 S.E.2d 881 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1957)
Budget Charge Accounts, Inc. v. Peters
96 S.E.2d 887 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1957)
Hambrick v. Bedsole
91 S.E.2d 205 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 S.E.2d 188, 211 Ga. 789, 1955 Ga. LEXIS 463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-carolina-housing-mortgage-corp-ga-1955.