Wesselenyi v. Santiago

286 A.D.2d 964, 731 N.Y.S.2d 421
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 28, 2001·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying defendants’ motion to bifurcate the trial. As a general rule, “[tissues of liability and damages in a negligence action are distinct and severable issues that should be tried and determined separately” (Hrusa v Bogdan, 278 AD2d 947; see, Stevens v Dorsaneo, 267 AD2d 997). Plaintiffs failed to establish the applicability of the exception to the general rule, which arises when “the injuries sustained by plaintiffs have an important bearing on the issue of liability and are probative in determining how the accident occurred” (Guizzotti v English, 273 AD2d 932). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Fahey, J. — Bifurcate Trial.) Present — Green, J. P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wesselenyi v. Santiago, 286 A.D.2d 964, 731 N.Y.S.2d 421 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

286 A.D.2d 964 (Wesselenyi v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Calvaneso v. Mochol
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026
Zbock v. Gietz
2018 NY Slip Op 4467 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Delano v. Grazulewicz
300 A.D.2d 1064 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)