Stevens v. Dorsaneo

267 A.D.2d 997, 700 N.Y.S.2d 887, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13736
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 1999·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion for a bifurcated trial in this personal injury action. Plaintiff did not oppose the motion and thus a fortiori failed to establish the need to depart from the general rule that “issues of liability and damages in a negligence action are distinct and severable issues which should be tried and determined separately” (Martinez v Town of Babylon, 191 AD2d 483, 484; see, Loncz v Blagrove, 254 AD2d 735, 736; Cutsogeorge v Hertz Corp., 239 AD2d 540; see also, 22 NYCRR 202.42 [a]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J. — Bifurcate Trial.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stevens v. Dorsaneo, 267 A.D.2d 997, 700 N.Y.S.2d 887, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13736 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

267 A.D.2d 997 (Stevens v. Dorsaneo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Piccione v. Tri-main Development, L.P.
5 A.D.3d 1086 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Mazur v. Mazur
288 A.D.2d 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Wesselenyi v. Santiago
286 A.D.2d 964 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)