Wesley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wesley v. State

347 S.W.3d 180, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1106, 2011 WL 3808229

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 30, 2011·No. ED 95814·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Aaron LaDale Wesley appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion 1 for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings of fact, conclusions of law and judgment are not clearly erroneous. Wilson v. State, 813 S.W.2d 833, 835 (Mo.banc 1991). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2009, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Aaron LaDale Wesley appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion 1 for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings of fact, conclusions of law and judgment are not clearly erroneous. Wilson v. State, 813 S.W.2d 833, 835 (Mo.banc 1991). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2009, unless otherwise indicated.

Wesley v. State, 347 S.W.3d 180, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1106, 2011 WL 3808229 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

347 S.W.3d 180 (Wesley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related