John v. State

347 S.W.3d 180, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1105, 2011 WL 3808231
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 30, 2011
DocketED 95830
StatusPublished

This text of 347 S.W.3d 180 (John v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
John v. State, 347 S.W.3d 180, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1105, 2011 WL 3808231 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charlotte John (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County denying her Rule 24.035 motion. Movant argues that the motion court clearly erred in denying, without an evidentiary hearing, her claim that her plea of guilty was unknowing, unintelligent, and involuntary because: 1) the *181 State breached the plea agreement; and 2) the sentencing court deviated from the plea-bargained sentence without giving her an opportunity to withdraw her plea.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wesley v. State
347 S.W.3d 180 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
347 S.W.3d 180, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1105, 2011 WL 3808231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-v-state-moctapp-2011.