Wesley Kennedy, Jr. v. Aspen, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 13, 2023
DocketA23A1637
StatusPublished

This text of Wesley Kennedy, Jr. v. Aspen, LLC (Wesley Kennedy, Jr. v. Aspen, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wesley Kennedy, Jr. v. Aspen, LLC, (Ga. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ July 13, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A23A1637. WESLEY KENNEDY, JR. v. ASPEN, LLC.

In this property action, Wesley Kennedy, Jr., filed an action against Aspen, LLC and others. Aspen, LLC filed a motion to dismiss the complaint as to it, which the trial court granted. Ultimately, Kennedy filed a notice of appeal seeking to appeal the order. We, however, lack jurisdiction. OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1) generally allows direct appeals from final judgments. “In a case involving multiple parties or multiple claims, a decision adjudicating fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of less than all the parties is not a final judgment.” Johnson v. Hosp. Corp. of America, 192 Ga. App. 628, 629 (385 SE2d 731) (1989) (punctuation omitted). Such a ruling may be appealed only if the trial court makes an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and an express direction for the entry of judgment under OCGA § 9-11-54 (b), or the party seeking to appeal complies with the interlocutory appeal requirements of OCGA § 5- 6-34 (b), including obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court. See id. The record before us contains no indication that the trial court directed the entry of judgment under OCGA § 9-11-54 (b) or that Kennedy’s claims against the remaining defendants have been dismissed. Because the claims against the other defendants remain pending, the order dismissing the complaint as to Aspen, LLC is a non-final order that did not resolve all issues in the case. See Conseco Fin. Servicing Corp. v. Hill, 252 Ga. App. 774, 775 (1) (556 SE2d 468) (2001); Johnson, 192 Ga. App. at 629. Therefore, Kennedy was required to follow the interlocutory appeal procedures set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). See Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 832-833 (471 SE2d 213) (1996); Scruggs v. Ga. Dept. of Human Resources, 261 Ga. 587, 588-589 (1) (408 SE2d 103) (1991). Kennedy’s failure to follow the proper appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 07/13/2023 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Hospital Corporation of America
385 S.E.2d 731 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Bailey v. Bailey
471 S.E.2d 213 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1996)
Scruggs v. Georgia Department of Human Resources
408 S.E.2d 103 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1991)
Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. v. Hill
556 S.E.2d 468 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wesley Kennedy, Jr. v. Aspen, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wesley-kennedy-jr-v-aspen-llc-gactapp-2023.