Wert v. ManorCare of Carlisle PA, LLC
95 A.3d 268, 626 Pa. 114, 2014 WL 2881198, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 1558
This text of 95 A.3d 268 (Wert v. ManorCare of Carlisle PA, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wert v. ManorCare of Carlisle PA, LLC, 95 A.3d 268, 626 Pa. 114, 2014 WL 2881198, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 1558 (Pa. 2014).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 24th day of June 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioners, are:
(1) Whether the Superior Court’s decision in Stewart v. GGNSC-Canonsburg, L.P., 9 A.3d 215 (Pa.Super.2010), holding that the NAF Designation voided an identical Arbi[269]*269tration Agreement, was incorrectly decided and should be reversed, where there is no evidence indicating that the NAF designation was integral to the Agreement?
(2) Whether the Court may ignore undisputed testimonial evidence that the party seeking to void the Agreement did not consider the NAF Designation to be an “integral part” of the Arbitration Agreement (because she did not read the agreement)1?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wert v. ManorCare of Carlisle PA, LLC
124 A.3d 1248 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2015)
Wisler v. Manor Care of Lancaster PA, LLC
124 A.3d 317 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2015)
Roberts, G. v. GGNSC Lancaster
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2015
Interstate Fire Protection v. Repal Construction
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2014
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
95 A.3d 268, 626 Pa. 114, 2014 WL 2881198, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 1558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wert-v-manorcare-of-carlisle-pa-llc-pa-2014.