Wenke v. Gehl Co.

2003 WI 96, 665 N.W.2d 211, 263 Wis. 2d 675, 2003 Wisc. LEXIS 465
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided July 8, 2003·No. 01-2649·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1. The court is equally divided on whether to affirm or reverse the judgment of the circuit court. Justice N. Patrick Crooks, Justice David T. Prosser, Jr., and Justice Diane S. Sykes would affirm. Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson, Justice William A. Bablitch, and Justice Ann Walsh Bradley would reverse. Justice Jon P Wilcox did not participate.

¶ 2. When a certification or bypass results in a tie vote by this court, the better course of action is to vacate our decision to accept certification or bypass and remand the cause to the court of appeals. State v. Richard Knutson, Inc., 191 Wis. 2d 395, 396-97, 528 N.W.2d 430 (1995) (remanding to court of appeals on a tie vote on certification); State v. Elam, 195 Wis. 2d 683, *677 684-85, 538 N.W.2d 249 (1995) (restating rule but declining to remand to court of appeals on a tie vote on bypass because court of appeals had previously decided issue).

¶ 3. Accordingly, we vacate our order granting certification and remand to the court of appeals.

By the Court. — The Order granting certification is vacated and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wenke v. Gehl Co., 2003 WI 96, 665 N.W.2d 211, 263 Wis. 2d 675, 2003 Wisc. LEXIS 465 (Wis. 2003).

2003 WI 96 (Wenke v. Gehl Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott Smith v. Greg Kleynerman
2017 WI 22 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2017)
New Richmond News v. City of New Richmond
2015 WI 106 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2015)