New Richmond News v. City of New Richmond

2015 WI 106, 875 N.W.2d 107, 365 Wis. 2d 610, 2015 Wisc. LEXIS 716
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 18, 2015
Docket2014AP001938
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 2015 WI 106 (New Richmond News v. City of New Richmond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New Richmond News v. City of New Richmond, 2015 WI 106, 875 N.W.2d 107, 365 Wis. 2d 610, 2015 Wisc. LEXIS 716 (Wis. 2015).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1. The court is equally divided on whether to affirm or reverse the judgment of the circuit court for St. Croix County. This case was argued before the full court; however, Justice N. Patrick Crooks passed away prior to the court's decision. Justice Rebecca G. Bradley was appointed to the court after the court's decision, and therefore did not participate. [612]*612Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson, Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, and Justice David T. Prosser would affirm. Chief Justice Patience Drake Roggensack, Justice Annette Kingsland Ziegler, and Justice Michael J. Gableman would reverse.

¶ 2. This court accepted jurisdiction over this appeal on a petition to bypass. Wis. Stat. § (Rule) 809.60 (2013-14). We have previously stated that when a tie vote occurs in this court on a bypass or certification, "justice is better served in such an instance by remanding to the court of appeals for their consideration." State v. Richard Knutson, Inc., 191 Wis. 2d 395, 396-97, 528 N.W.2d 430 (1995) (remanding to court of appeals on a tie vote on certification); see also State v. Elam, 195 Wis. 2d 683, 684-85, 538 N.W.2d 249 (1995) (restating rule but declining to remand to court of appeals on a tie vote on bypass because court of appeals had previously decided issue).

¶ 3. Accordingly, we vacate our order granting the petition to bypass and remand to the court of appeals.

By the Court. — Decision to grant the petition to bypass vacated and cause remanded.

¶ 4. REBECCA G. BRADLEY, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott Smith v. Greg Kleynerman
2017 WI 22 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2017)
New Richmond News v. City of New Richmond
2016 WI App 43 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 2016)
Clark ex rel. Gramling v. American Cyanamid Co.
2016 WI 24 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2016)
Yasmine Clark v. American Cyanamid Company
Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2016
State v. Charles v. Matalonis
2016 WI 7 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2016)
New Richmond News v. City of New Richmond
2015 WI 106 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2015 WI 106, 875 N.W.2d 107, 365 Wis. 2d 610, 2015 Wisc. LEXIS 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-richmond-news-v-city-of-new-richmond-wis-2015.