Wendy Colima Arroyo v. Eric Holder, Jr.
This text of 550 F. App'x 408 (Wendy Colima Arroyo v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Wendy Colima Arroyo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. Morales-Alegria v. Gonzales, 449 F.3d 1051, 1053 (9th Cir.2006). We deny the petition for review.
The BIA correctly concluded that Colima Arroyo’s conviction under California Penal Code § 476, which resulted in a one-year prison sentence, constitutes an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(R) that renders her statutorily ineligible to seek cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(3); see also Morales-Alegria, 449 F.3d at 1058 (a conviction under California Penal Code § 476 is categorically a forgery offense).
Colima Arroyo’s challenge to this court’s decision in Morales-Alegria also fails. See Avagyan v. Holder, 646 F.3d 672, 677 (9th Cir.2011) (A three-judge panel cannot reconsider or overrule circuit precedent with exceptions not relevant here).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
550 F. App'x 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wendy-colima-arroyo-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2013.