Wendover & Hinton v. Hogeboom
7 Johns. 308
Opinion
The defendants are not liable. The property in the vessel was not in the defendants, when the plaintiffs sold the sails to the master. They had ceased to be owners. The credit was given to the master. The motion must, therefore, be denied.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wendover & Hinton v. Hogeboom, 7 Johns. 308 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).
7 Johns. 308 (Wendover & Hinton v. Hogeboom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
American Car & Foundry Co. v. Brassert
289 U.S. 261 (Supreme Court, 1933)
Davidson v. Baldwin
79 F. 95 (Sixth Circuit, 1897)
Scranton v. Coe
40 Conn. 159 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1873)
Meyer v. Goedel
31 How. Pr. 456 (New York Supreme Court, 1865)
CALAIS STEAMBOAT COMPANY v. Van Pelt's Administrator
67 U.S. 372 (Supreme Court, 1863)
Scudder v. Calais Steamboat Co.
21 F. Cas. 883 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine, 1860)
Thompson v. Van Vechten
5 Abb. Pr. 458 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1857)
Stacy v. Graham
3 Duer 444 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1854)
Fontaine v. Beers
19 Ala. 722 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1851)
Hesketh v. Stevens
7 Barb. 488 (New York Supreme Court, 1849)
Thorn & Thorn v. Hicks
7 Cow. 697 (New York Supreme Court, 1827)
Ohl v. Eagle Ins.
18 F. Cas. 630 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1827)
Thuret v. Jenkins
5 Mart. 318 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1820)