Welsbach Light Co. v. Rex Incandescent Light Co.

87 F. 477, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2598
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedMarch 19, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 87 F. 477 (Welsbach Light Co. v. Rex Incandescent Light Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Welsbach Light Co. v. Rex Incandescent Light Co., 87 F. 477, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2598 (circtsdny 1898).

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge.

The bills allege that one Carl Auer von Welsbach was the first inventor of certain new and useful improvements in the “manufacture of gas incandescents,” for which letters patent of the United States, numbered 409,531, were on the 20 rh day of August, 1889, issued to him, assignor to the plaintiff, with profert of the assignment. No profert of the patent is made, nor other description of the invention set out. The bill is demurred to f >r this cause, among others not so well founded; and the demurrer [478]*478has been argued. That the invention should be set out iñ the bill by allegation, profert of the patent or copy of it annexed, so as to inform the defendant what is claimed to have been infringed, is so fundamental that it need hardly be stated. In Dickerson v. Greene, 53 Fed. 247, and American Bell Tel. Co. v. Southern Tel. Co., 34 Fed. 803, relied upon- by the plaintiff to show the sufficiency of a general description of the invention, the bills each made profert of the patents. The profert of the assignment is argued to be sufficient to supply this defect, but it adds nothing in this behalf. For this defect the demurrer must be sustained. The complainant should, however, have leave to amend. Demurrer sustained, .with leave to amend by next rule day.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Welsbach Light Co. v. Rex Incandescent Light Co.
93 F. 989 (Second Circuit, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 F. 477, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welsbach-light-co-v-rex-incandescent-light-co-circtsdny-1898.