Welsbach Light Co. v. Apollo Incandescent Gaslight Co.

94 F. 1005, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2653
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedJuly 12, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 94 F. 1005 (Welsbach Light Co. v. Apollo Incandescent Gaslight Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Welsbach Light Co. v. Apollo Incandescent Gaslight Co., 94 F. 1005, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2653 (circtsdny 1898).

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

Upon this application the question is raised, whether or not, by reason of the circumstance that a pr-ior foreign patent for the same invention lapsed subsequent to the application, but before the issue of the United States, patent, such United States patent was improperly issued. Under decisions of the supreme court fhere is so much doubt as to the correct answer to this question that it should not be decided upon preliminary motion, but upon final hearing, so that the party who may be defeated upon appeal may be in a position to apply to that court for a certiorari, should it be so advised. Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Welsbach Light Co. v. Rex Incandescent Light Co.
94 F. 1005 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 F. 1005, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/welsbach-light-co-v-apollo-incandescent-gaslight-co-circtsdny-1898.