Wells v. State

558 So. 2d 205, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1824, 1990 WL 31539
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 22, 1990·No. No. 89-1391·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed except for the imposition of costs pursuant to sections 27.3455; 960.20; and 943.25, Florida Statutes (1987), which were imposed without the requisite notice and opportunity to be heard required by Florida law. See Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (FIa.1989); Harriel v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla.1988); Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). This provision is stricken without prejudice to be assessed in accordance with due process requirements.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

COWART, GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wells v. State, 558 So. 2d 205, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1824, 1990 WL 31539 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

558 So. 2d 205 (Wells v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fulks v. Fulks
558 So. 2d 205 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)