Wells v. State
This text of 558 So. 2d 205 (Wells v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed except for the imposition of costs pursuant to sections 27.3455; 960.20; and 943.25, Florida Statutes (1987), which were imposed without the requisite notice and opportunity to be heard required by Florida law. See Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (FIa.1989); Harriel v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla.1988); Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). This provision is stricken without prejudice to be assessed in accordance with due process requirements.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
558 So. 2d 205, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1824, 1990 WL 31539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.