Wells v. State

558 So. 2d 205, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1824, 1990 WL 31539
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 22, 1990
DocketNo. 89-1391
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 558 So. 2d 205 (Wells v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wells v. State, 558 So. 2d 205, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1824, 1990 WL 31539 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed except for the imposition of costs pursuant to sections 27.3455; 960.20; and 943.25, Florida Statutes (1987), which were imposed without the requisite notice and opportunity to be heard required by Florida law. See Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (FIa.1989); Harriel v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla.1988); Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). This provision is stricken without prejudice to be assessed in accordance with due process requirements.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

COWART, GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fulks v. Fulks
558 So. 2d 205 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
558 So. 2d 205, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1824, 1990 WL 31539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.