Wells v. Crosby
886 So. 2d 246, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15150, 2004 WL 2309972
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wells v. Crosby. Read the opinion of the Court — 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14951 →
Opinion
Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s July 8, 2004, order, and finding that the notice of appeal was not timely filed, the appeal is hereby dismissed as untimely. This dismissal is without prejudice to the appellant’s right to seek relief in the trial court pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540. See Day v. Moore, 785 So.2d 699 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Cf. Brigham v. State, 769 So.2d 1100, 1101 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wells v. Crosby, 886 So. 2d 246, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 15150, 2004 WL 2309972 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
886 So. 2d 246 (Wells v. Crosby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Day v. Moore
785 So. 2d 699 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Brigham v. State
769 So. 2d 1100 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)