Day v. Moore
This text of 785 So. 2d 699 (Day v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Charles R. DAY, Petitioner,
v.
Michael W. MOORE, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and the Florida Parole Commission, Respondents.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Charles R. Day, pro se, petitioner.
No appearance for respondents.
*700 PER CURIAM.
By petition for writ of certiorari, Charles R. Day seeks review of an order of the circuit court denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Because the petition was not timely filed, we dismiss it for lack of jurisdiction. We note, however, that Day alleges that he did not receive a copy of the trial court's order until after the 30-day period for invoking appellate jurisdiction had expired. Accordingly, this disposition is without prejudice to petitioner's right to seek relief in the trial court by motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540, requesting that the original order be set aside and that a new order be entered, such that the right to seek review may be preserved. See, e.g., Brown v. Florida Parole Commission, 763 So.2d 1262 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).
WEBSTER, BROWNING and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
785 So. 2d 699, 2001 WL 530503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/day-v-moore-fladistctapp-2001.