Wells v. BAE Systems Norfolk Ship Repair
This text of 250 F. App'x 552 (Wells v. BAE Systems Norfolk Ship Repair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Carolyn Wells appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s summary judgment motion on her disability discrimination claims brought pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (2000), and the Virginia Human Rights Act, Va.Code Ann. §§ 2.2-3900-2.2-3902 (2005). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wells v. BAE Sys. Norfolk Ship Repair, 483 F.Supp.2d 497 (E.D.Va. 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
250 F. App'x 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wells-v-bae-systems-norfolk-ship-repair-ca4-2007.