Wellington & Powellsville Railroad v. Cashie & Chowan Railroad & Lumber Co.

114 N.C. 690
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 15, 1894·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

Upon a consideration of the affidavits filed we are of the opinion that the order of his Honor should not be disturbed. It may also be observed that the existence of the corporation cannot be assailed in this collateral manner (Asheville Div. v. Aston, 92 N. C., 578), and that the amount of land sought to be condemned does not appear' to be unreasonable. The very granting of a charter, like [692] this implies that land is necessary to be taken for the right of way, and, unless the discretion is abused, the Courts will not interfere. Railroad v. Railroad, 106 N. C., 23.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wellington & Powellsville Railroad v. Cashie & Chowan Railroad & Lumber Co., 114 N.C. 690 (N.C. 1894).

114 N.C. 690 (Wellington & Powellsville Railroad v. Cashie & Chowan Railroad & Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fayetteville Street Railway v. Railroad
142 N.C. 423 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1906)
Railroad v. Olive
55 S.E. 263 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1906)
Morrison v. Indianapolis & Western Railway Co.
76 N.E. 961 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1906)
Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Union Springs & Northern Ry. Co.
39 So. 473 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1905)
Fisher v. Insurance Co.
48 S.E. 667 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1904)
Holly Shelter Railroad v. Newton
45 S.E. 549 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1903)