Welliever v. MacNulty
310 P.2d 531, 50 Wash. 2d 224
Opinion
ETHEL S. WELLIEVER, Appellant,
v.
ALEXANDER C. MacNULTY et al., Respondents.[1]
The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.
Cashatt & Williams and James P. Connelly, for appellant.
John D. MacGillivray and Willard W. Jones, for respondents.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal involves a factual issue. The evidence with reference to it was conflicting. The jury determined the issue in favor of the respondents. The jury is the sole judge of the facts. Arthurs v. National Postal Transport Ass'n, 49 Wn. (2d) 570, 577, 304 P. (2d) 685, and case cited.
The judgment is affirmed.
NOTES
[1] Reported in 310 P. (2d) 531.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Welliever v. MacNulty, 310 P.2d 531, 50 Wash. 2d 224 (Wash. 1957).
310 P.2d 531 (Welliever v. MacNulty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Udhus v. Peglow
350 P.2d 640 (Washington Supreme Court, 1960)
Jay v. Walla Walla College
335 P.2d 458 (Washington Supreme Court, 1959)
Holmes v. Toothaker
328 P.2d 146 (Washington Supreme Court, 1958)
Porter v. Department of Labor & Industries
320 P.2d 1099 (Washington Supreme Court, 1958)