Weller v. New York

268 U.S. 319, 45 S. Ct. 556, 69 L. Ed. 978, 1925 U.S. LEXIS 570
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 25, 1925·No. 349·Published·Cited by 22 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice McReynolds

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Chapter 590, New York Laws 1922, added eight sections, 167-174, to the General Business Law of the State. They are copied in the margin. * Section 168 directs: “No per *323 son, firm or corporation shall resell or engage in the business of reselling any tickets of admission or any other evidence of the right of entry to a theatre, place of amusement or entertainment, or other places where public exhibitions, games, contests or performances are held without having first procured a license therefor from the comptroller.” And § 173 declares every-violation of the inhibition' shall be a misdemeanor.

By ,an information in the Court of Special Sessions, New York City, the District Attorney accused plaintiff in error of engaging in the business, of reselling theatre tickets without the license required by law. The evidence showed he was engaged in that business, and it was conceded he had never taken out a license or complied with Chapter- *324 590. His defense rested upon the claim that the statute is repugnant to the Fourteenth Amendment. The trial court adjudged him guilty and imposed a fine of twenty-five dollars. This was affirmed by the Appellate Division and by the Court of Appeals. 207 App. Div. 337; 237 N. Y. 316. In an extended opinion the latter court upheld the challenged enactment, but said nothing of the *325 possibility of sustaining the license provisions if those relating to resale prices' were invalid.

Counsel for plaintiff in error now insists that the two provisions are inseparable; that those which undertake to establish resale prices are. clearly invalid; and, consequently, the whole Act must fall. On the contrary, counsel for the people maintain that the power of the State to require such licenses is clear and that we need not determine the validity of the price restrictions.

It is not and, we think, it cannot seriously be urged that the State lacked power to require licenses of those engaging in the business of reselling theatre tickets. The conviction and sentence were for failure to observe that requirement. In the absence of an authoritative announcement of another view by some court of the State we shall hold this provision severable and valid. Brazee v. Michigan, 241 U. S. 340. The statute itself declares (§ 174): “In case it be judicially determined that any section of this article is unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such determination shall not affect the validity or effect of the remaining provisions of the article.” If § 172, which restricts resale prices were eliminated, a workable plan would still remain. See Dorchy v. Kansas, 264 U. S. 286.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weller v. New York, 268 U.S. 319, 45 S. Ct. 556, 69 L. Ed. 978, 1925 U.S. LEXIS 570 (1925).

268 U.S. 319 (Weller v. New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New Jersey Ass'n of Ticket Brokers v. Ticketron
543 A.2d 997 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1988)
NJ ASS'N OF TICKET BR. v. Ticketron
543 A.2d 997 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1988)
Amog v. Keatley
2 N. Mar. I. Commw. 155 (Northern Mariana Islands Commonwealth Trial Court, 1985)
City of Seattle v. Bittner
505 P.2d 126 (Washington Supreme Court, 1973)
United States v. Thoresen
281 F. Supp. 598 (N.D. California, 1967)
Grow System School v. Board of Regents of University of New York
277 A.D.2d 122 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)
Tooz v. State
38 N.W.2d 285 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1949)
Velazquez v. Hunter
159 F.2d 606 (Tenth Circuit, 1947)
Kelly-Sullivan, Inc. v. Moss
174 Misc. 1098 (New York Supreme Court, 1940)
Nelsen v. Tilley
289 N.W. 388 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1939)
Devito v. Moss
170 Misc. 170 (New York Supreme Court, 1939)
Sonzinsky v. United States
300 U.S. 506 (Supreme Court, 1937)
Fearon v. Treanor
248 A.D. 225 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)
Rieder v. Rogan
12 F. Supp. 307 (S.D. California, 1935)
Nitrate Agencies Co. v. Gallardo
44 P.R. 498 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1933)
Tyson & Brother v. Banton
273 U.S. 418 (Supreme Court, 1927)
Roman v. Lobe
152 N.E. 461 (New York Court of Appeals, 1926)