Roman v. Lobe

New York Court of Appeals

Roman v. Lobe

152 N.E. 430, 242 N.Y. 568, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 1097

DecidedMarch 30, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 152 N.E. 430 (Roman v. Lobe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roman v. Lobe, 152 N.E. 430, 242 N.Y. 568, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 1097 (N.Y. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In view of the fact, which is now pointed out to us upon this motion for reargument, that the defendant’s answer admits the employment of the plaintiff and his procurement of the sale, the judgment of the Appellate Division must have been based upon the holding that a license was essential, since no other issue was presented by the pleadings.

A reargument will be granted to the end that the constitutionality of the statute (Real Prop. Law [Cons. Laws, ch. 50], § 442-e) may be considered and determined.

Pursuant to section 68 of the Executive Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 18), the plaintiff is directed to give notice to the Attorney-General of the argument of this appeal and the questions to be raised thereon.

Motion for reargument granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In view of the fact, which is now pointed out to us upon this motion for reargument, that the defendant’s answer admits the employment of the plaintiff and his procurement of the sale, the judgment of the Appellate Division must have been based upon the holding that a license was essential, since no other issue was presented by the pleadings.

A reargument will be granted to the end that the constitutionality of the statute (Real Prop. Law [Cons. Laws, ch. 50], § 442-e) may be considered and determined.

Pursuant to section 68 of the Executive Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 18), the plaintiff is directed to give notice to the Attorney-General of the argument of this appeal and the questions to be raised thereon.

Motion for reargument granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 N.E. 430, 242 N.Y. 568, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 1097, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roman-v-lobe-ny-1926.