Wellborn v. Sellers

245 S.W.3d 243, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1403, 2007 WL 2989007
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 2007·No. WD 67240·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants William and Katherine Well-born appeal a judgment in favor of Respondents Donald and Loretta Sellers concerning Appellants’ Petition for Collection of Amount Owed. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wellborn v. Sellers, 245 S.W.3d 243, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1403, 2007 WL 2989007 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

245 S.W.3d 243 (Wellborn v. Sellers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Guinn v. State
245 S.W.3d 243 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)