Wellborn v. Sellers

245 S.W.3d 243, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1403, 2007 WL 2989007
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 16, 2007
DocketWD 67240
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 245 S.W.3d 243 (Wellborn v. Sellers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wellborn v. Sellers, 245 S.W.3d 243, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1403, 2007 WL 2989007 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants William and Katherine Well-born appeal a judgment in favor of Respondents Donald and Loretta Sellers concerning Appellants’ Petition for Collection of Amount Owed. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Guinn v. State
245 S.W.3d 243 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 S.W.3d 243, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1403, 2007 WL 2989007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wellborn-v-sellers-moctapp-2007.