Guinn v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Guinn v. State

245 S.W.3d 243, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1404, 2007 WL 2989012

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 2007·No. WD 67314·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

James Guinn appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his motion under Rule 24.035 to set aside his guilty plea to possession of a controlled substance, Section 195.202, RSMo.2000. He contends solely that the trial court failed to make a specific factual finding or conclusion of law regarding one of the claims in his post-conviction motion. We disagree and find the court’s order sufficient. Because no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion, the judgment of conviction is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum explaining the reasoning of the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

James Guinn appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his motion under Rule 24.035 to set aside his guilty plea to possession of a controlled substance, Section 195.202, RSMo.2000. He contends solely that the trial court failed to make a specific factual finding or conclusion of law regarding one of the claims in his post-conviction motion. We disagree and find the court’s order sufficient. Because no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion, the judgment of conviction is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum explaining the reasoning of the court.

Guinn v. State, 245 S.W.3d 243, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1404, 2007 WL 2989012 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

245 S.W.3d 243 (Guinn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related