Guinn v. State
This text of 245 S.W.3d 243 (Guinn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
James Guinn appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his motion under Rule 24.035 to set aside his guilty plea to possession of a controlled substance, Section 195.202, RSMo.2000. He contends solely that the trial court failed to make a specific factual finding or conclusion of law regarding one of the claims in his post-conviction motion. We disagree and find the court’s order sufficient. Because no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion, the judgment of conviction is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum explaining the reasoning of the court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
245 S.W.3d 243, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1404, 2007 WL 2989012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/guinn-v-state-moctapp-2007.