Welch v. Mandeville

29 F. Cas. 606, 1 Cranch 489

Opinion

But THE COURT

refused to reinstate the cause, and ordered it to be dismissed according to the agreement of the parties, to which refusal Allen Prior took a bill of exceptions, which the court signed.

E. J. Lee, for Allen Prior, cited the following authorities, viz.: Corser v. Craig [Case No. 3,255], in the circuit court of Pennsylvania, by Judge Washington; Ex parte Byas, 1 Atk. 124; Atkin v. Barwick, 1 Strange, 165, 166; Ex parte Oursell, Amb. 297; Yeates v. Groves, 1 Ves. Jr. 280; Ancher v. Bank of England, 2 Doug. 637; McCullum v. Coxe, 1 Dall. 139; Fitzgerald v. Caldwell, 2 Dall. 215; Gibson v. Minet, 1 H. Bl. 602; Chit. Bills, 1, 2; Winch v. Keeley, 1 Term R. 619; Young v. Willing, 2 Dall. [2 U. S.] 276; Row v. Dawson, 1 Ves. Sr. 331.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Welch v. Mandeville, 29 F. Cas. 606, 1 Cranch 489 (circtddc 1808).

29 F. Cas. 606 (Welch v. Mandeville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fitzgerald v. Caldwell
2 U.S. 215 (Supreme Court, 1793)
M'CULLUM v. Coxe
1 U.S. 139 (Supreme Court, 1785)