M'CULLUM v. Coxe

Supreme Court

M'CULLUM v. Coxe

1 U.S. 139, 1 Dall. 139

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 1, 1785

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 1 U.S. 139 (M'CULLUM v. Coxe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

M'CULLUM v. Coxe, 1 U.S. 139, 1 Dall. 139 (1785).

Pincite

Opinion

These facts being made to appear, the Court said they would not allow any collusive settlement between the original parties, to affect General Forman’s bona fide assignment, and ordered the jury to be sworn. And M‘Kean, Chief Justice, observed, that where an action was brought under such circumstances, it ought to be mentioned upon the docket for whose use; a pratice which had always prevailed when he was at the bar.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

These facts being made to appear, the Court said they would not allow any collusive settlement between the original parties, to affect General Forman’s bona fide assignment, and ordered the jury to be sworn. And M‘Kean, Chief Justice, observed, that where an action was brought under such circumstances, it ought to be mentioned upon the docket for whose use; a pratice which had always prevailed when he was at the bar.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 U.S. 139, 1 Dall. 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcullum-v-coxe-scotus-1785.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack