Weist v. Morlock

Michigan Supreme Court

Weist v. Morlock

74 N.W. 1012, 116 Mich. 606, 1898 Mich. LEXIS 738

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 19, 1898·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Grant, C. J.

This case involves $300, and was tried before the court without a jury. The court made written findings of facts and law, to none of which were any exceptions taken. Several errors are assigned upon both. Under the repeated decisions of this court, the only question open for decision is whether the findings support the judgment. Upon this point there is no allegation of error, [607]*607and it is not argued in the brief. It is not, therefore, open for consideration. Cook v. Burnett, 83 Mich. 251. We have, however, examined the findings sufficiently to hold that they support the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grant, C. J.

This case involves $300, and was tried before the court without a jury. The court made written findings of facts and law, to none of which were any exceptions taken. Several errors are assigned upon both. Under the repeated decisions of this court, the only question open for decision is whether the findings support the judgment. Upon this point there is no allegation of error, [607]*607and it is not argued in the brief. It is not, therefore, open for consideration. Cook v. Burnett, 83 Mich. 251. We have, however, examined the findings sufficiently to hold that they support the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

The other Justices concurred.

Weist v. Morlock, 74 N.W. 1012, 116 Mich. 606, 1898 Mich. LEXIS 738 (Mich. 1898).

Pincite

74 N.W. 1012 (Weist v. Morlock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related