Ironton Cross Tie Co. v. Evans

Michigan Supreme Court

Ironton Cross Tie Co. v. Evans

109 N.W. 254, 146 Mich. 197, 1906 Mich. LEXIS 883

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 29, 1906

DocketDocket No. 7

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 109 N.W. 254 (Ironton Cross Tie Co. v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ironton Cross Tie Co. v. Evans, 109 N.W. 254, 146 Mich. 197, 1906 Mich. LEXIS 883 (Mich. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Ostrander, J.

The case was tried without a jury, and the court made findings of fact and of law. The record is certified to contain all of the evidence given upon the trial. Nineteen errors, fourteen of which relate to the admission or rejection of testimony, are assigned. • It is claimed, also, that there is no evidence to support the third, and no competent evidence to support the fourth, fifth, and sixth findings of fact. No exceptions were taken to any of the findings, and it is not assigned as error, or contended, that the facts found do not support the conclusion of law.

The judgment must be affirmed upon the authority of Weist v. Morlock, 116 Mich. 606; Stafford v. Crawford, 118 Mich. 285; Circuit Court Rule No. 26.

McAlvay, Grant, Blair, and Moore, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ostrander, J.

The case was tried without a jury, and the court made findings of fact and of law. The record is certified to contain all of the evidence given upon the trial. Nineteen errors, fourteen of which relate to the admission or rejection of testimony, are assigned. • It is claimed, also, that there is no evidence to support the third, and no competent evidence to support the fourth, fifth, and sixth findings of fact. No exceptions were taken to any of the findings, and it is not assigned as error, or contended, that the facts found do not support the conclusion of law.

The judgment must be affirmed upon the authority of Weist v. Morlock, 116 Mich. 606; Stafford v. Crawford, 118 Mich. 285; Circuit Court Rule No. 26.

McAlvay, Grant, Blair, and Moore, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 N.W. 254, 146 Mich. 197, 1906 Mich. LEXIS 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ironton-cross-tie-co-v-evans-mich-1906.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack