Weissfeld v. Summers
This text of 196 Misc. 450 (Weissfeld v. Summers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court below was without power to reduce the tenant’s rent based upon an alleged decrease in the minimnm [451]*451services. The remedy, if any, is by appropriate application to the Housing Expediter under paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) and paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) of section 5 of the Federal Controlled Housing Rent Regulation (Penner v. Geller, 193 Misc. 821; G. M. G. Realty Co. v. Spring, 191 Misc. 945).
The final order should be unanimously modified upon the law by increasing the amount of the recovery to $75 with disbursements, and as so modified, affirmed, with $25 costs to landlord. Steinbrink, Fennelly and Bubenstein, JJ., concur.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
196 Misc. 450, 94 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3074, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weissfeld-v-summers-nyappterm-1949.