Weissfeld v. Summers

196 Misc. 450, 94 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3074
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided October 6, 1949·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court below was without power to reduce the tenant’s rent based upon an alleged decrease in the minimnm [451]*451services. The remedy, if any, is by appropriate application to the Housing Expediter under paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) and paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) of section 5 of the Federal Controlled Housing Rent Regulation (Penner v. Geller, 193 Misc. 821; G. M. G. Realty Co. v. Spring, 191 Misc. 945).

The final order should be unanimously modified upon the law by increasing the amount of the recovery to $75 with disbursements, and as so modified, affirmed, with $25 costs to landlord. Steinbrink, Fennelly and Bubenstein, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weissfeld v. Summers, 196 Misc. 450, 94 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3074 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

196 Misc. 450 (Weissfeld v. Summers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Serxner v. Elgart
196 Misc. 1053 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)