G. M. G. Realty Co. v. Spring

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

G. M. G. Realty Co. v. Spring

191 Misc. 945, 82 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3182

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 17, 1948·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Rent Director, if he had so intended, could have limited the term “ occupant ” to persons above a particular age by use of appropriate language. The power to fix the rents was vested in him and not in the courts. In conducting the premises the landlord was obligated to show an equal measure of protection to the adults and the infant.

The final order, should be unanimously reversed on the law, with $30 costs to the landlord, and judgment directed in landlord’s favor for the sum of $44.75, with appropriate costs in the court below. 1

MacCrate, Steinbeink and Rubenstein, JJ., concur.

Final order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The Rent Director, if he had so intended, could have limited the term “ occupant ” to persons above a particular age by use of appropriate language. The power to fix the rents was vested in him and not in the courts. In conducting the premises the landlord was obligated to show an equal measure of protection to the adults and the infant.

The final order, should be unanimously reversed on the law, with $30 costs to the landlord, and judgment directed in landlord’s favor for the sum of $44.75, with appropriate costs in the court below. 1

MacCrate, Steinbeink and Rubenstein, JJ., concur.

Final order reversed, etc.

G. M. G. Realty Co. v. Spring, 191 Misc. 945, 82 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3182 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

191 Misc. 945 (G. M. G. Realty Co. v. Spring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related